Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces update#
Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces full#
Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces software#
Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces code#

First, they allow you to compare your code base to others Is either green (close to average range), blue (close to low range), or The numbers indicate the ratios the colors indicate where the ratiosįit into the industry-standard ranges (derived from numerous open source Ranges for those numbers.It is separated into three different categories Metrics for your project along with comparisons to industry-standard It somehow answers the question 'Howĭoes my project compare to others?'.It generates a pyramid, showing key (package, inheritance, class and modules). Like coupling, encapsulation and design flaws on different levels Measure of 'badness' of the analyzed system's design quality respectingīeside those high-level measures, inFusion also presents visualizations The publications mentioned below) a 'Quality Deficit Index' (QDI) isĬomputed. The QDI is a positive, upwards unbound value, which is a With the right mapping (which could be looked up in inFusion itself or By taking into accountĪlso the 'bad smells' these deviations are quantified. Known 'design principles' (e.g. DRY Principle and the Law ofĭemeter). With these principles in mind, inFusion measures deviationsįrom most of these principles and design rules. Set of five 'design properties' which is build up on a couple of well QM defines two decompositional layers: a layer of 'quality attributes',Īnd a layer of 'design properties'. Words the quality of the system’s architecture and design. InFusion defines the notion of quality as “internal quality”, in other Some of its measurable characteristics. Quality itself can mean aĬouple of different things (External, Process, Internal quality).

Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces software#

Model (QM) which expresses the quality of a software system in terms of So it is introducing a special kind of quality InFusion assesses software quality in a way that is build around but notĬentered on metrics. Is simple, feel free to proceed to the single results. You feel you have seen enough of this before and everything down below Views on the different projects by looking at the delivered quality.īefore we get to the results I need to introduce you to some basics. With this post I am not trying to blame anybody about politicalĬorrect behavior but trying to bring this back to some more objective You can think about what he is doing and like it or Looking at theĬommunities using it I always get the feeling that there is kind of aĬompetition for the one and only. Like me to do a complete product post, let me know in the comments!Īre the three mostly used JSF component libraries. Like today! Please look at the resources underneath this post forįurther links about inFusion and the principles behind it. Software cities or blog about quality of open source projects in general Without this I would not be able to show you the great

Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces full#

Adrian Trifuįor providing a full functional test and evaluation license of their It focuses on architecture and design qualityĪnd allows for quality assurance of multi-million LOC systems.īefore I give you an idea about what inFusion can do for you (implicitlyīy analyzing the candidates, I don't do advertising :-D) I have to It did the trick for GlassFish City posts ( First, Second).īut beside this it is far more. Thanks to the recent needs for a FAMIX 2.1 exporter I was looking againĪt inFusion. The tools I used back in 2009 are still valid but the tool-suite was aīit tricky to setup and I was simply missing the time for doing this.

Primeface vs icefaces vs richfaces update#

Things have changed since thanĪnd I wanted to re-evaluate and update this since some time now. It has been a while since I last looked at the quality of the three